Logo



About EALG

List of members



Library links

Contactus.html

Membersonly.html

Home page


EALG BRIEFING SEPTEMBER 2005 VOL. 2 NO. 3

A SUMMARY OF RECENT LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS IN EUROPE AND THE UNITED STATES
COMPILED BY MEMBERS OF THE EURO-AMERICAN LAWYERS GROUP.

IN THIS ISSUE:

BELGIUM

THE NETHERLANDS

NORWAY

UNITED STATES

ABOUT THE EURO-AMERICAN LAWYERS GROUP (EALG)


BELGIUM
NEW LAW GOVERNS PRE-CONTRACT DISCLOSURES IN FRANCHISING AGREEMENTS

The Belgian Parliament has enacted a new law concerning the pre-contractual information that is required to be disclosed on potential franchising agreements.  The new law stipulates documents that must be provided to a potential franchisee prior to entering into such agreements.  The new law also allows franchisees to nullify their contracts if the new disclosure requirements have been violated.

For further details, please see the detailed article on the EALG News/Information web page, or contact Robbie Tas, Partner, robbie.tas@maxius.be, or Sarah Van Haute, sarah.vanhaute@maxius.be, Maxius, Louvain, Belgium; http://www.maxius.be

back to top

THE NETHERLANDS
NEW LAW GOVERNING DOCUMENTATION OF CORPORATIONS

    Information about companies, including bankruptcy orders and suspension of payment ordered, is now more readily available pursuant to a new law which has taken effect this year.  In the past, bankruptcy and similar orders were merely recorded in the public registers of the separate courts.  This information is now also being stored in a central automated system.  The new law sets forth specific purposes for which recorded information on a company may be gathered and disclosed.  It is intended, in part, to be used for the prevention and repression of the misuse of companies, including those committing crimes and offenses of a financial or economic character.

For further details, please read the full article at the EALG News/Information web page, or contact Jurgen van Berkel, De Boort Hermes De Bont, Tilburg, Holland, j.vanberkel@devoort.nl; http://www.devoort.nl.

back to top

THE NETHERLANDS
AMENDMENT OF DUTCH WORKS COUNCIL ACT

The Netherlands has implemented EU Directive Number 2002/14/EG, the purpose of which is to close the gaps and remedy the shortcomings that had existed on a national and community level concerning worker participation in enterprises.  The new Directive lays down a general framework of minimum requirements concerning the right of information and consultation of employees of enterprises or subsidiaries.  Because the Dutch Works Council Law grants the Works Council many more rights and powers than those mentioned in the Directive, only a limited number of modifications of the Works Council law were needed for the implementation of the EU Directive.

For further details, please read the full article at the EALG News/Information web page, or contact Steven Jellinghaus, De Boort Hermes De Bont, Tilburg, Holland, s.jellinghaus@devoort.nl; http://www.devoort.nl

back to top

THE NETHERLANDS
SHAREHOLDERS MAY BE ALLOWED TO VOTE BY E-MAIL

The Dutch Parliament is considering a proposal to allow the use of electronic means of communications in the decision making process in general shareholders' meetings of limited liability companies and limited liability companies, as well as in general meetings of associations, corporations, and mutual insurance companies.  Under current law the ability to use such communications faces obstacles or legal uncertainty.  Other countries in the European Union, for example, France and the United Kingdom, already have regulations allowing the use of electronic communications in corporate governance.  It remains to be seen whether the Dutch company law will be amended to permit the use of such communications in Holland.

For further details, please read the full article at the EALG News/Information web page, or contact Jurgen van Berkel, De Boort Hermes De Bont, Tilburg, Holland, j.vanberkel@devoort.nl; http://www.devoort.nl.

back to top

THE NETHERLANDS
COLLECTIVE LABOUR AGREEMENT MAY ALSO APPLY TO FOREIGN WORKERS

The Minister of Social Affairs and Employment has submitted a bill to the Dutch Parliament on the extension of the scope of the Terms of Employment (Cross-border Work) Act.  Under terms of the bill, foreign employers will have to pay employees whom they wish to employ in The Netherlands in accordance with the Collective Labour Agreement.  The proposed law would also extend other benefits of the Agreement to foreign employees.  Currently, foreign employers who are seconding employees in The Netherlands only  have to comply with the current minimum terms, such as the legal minimum wage or minimum rest hours.  The main provisions of the Collective Labour Agreement only apply to foreign employees who are seconded in the building industry.

For further details, please read the full article at the EALG News/Information web page, or contact Steven Jellinghaus, De Boort Hermes De Bont, Tilburg, Holland, s.jellinghaus@devoort.nl; http://www.devoort.nl

back to top

THE NETHERLANDS
STATUS OF INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS CLARIFIED

The Extension of Effects VAR is now effective.  As of this year, a declaration of independent contractor status (VAR) by the Tax authorities protects principals against payment of employee's contributions and wage tax.  The new law is expected to increase the attractiveness of independent entrepreneurship in The Netherlands.  It gives the principal of the independent contractor the certainty that he will not have to pay tax and employee contributions.

For further details, please read the full article at the EALG News/Information web page, or contact Jurgen van Berkel, De Boort Hermes De Bont, Tilburg, Holland, j.vanberkel@devoort.nl; http://www.devoort.nl.

back to top

THE NETHERLANDS
NEW ATTACHMENT SYLLABUS

Prior to 2005, only the courts in The Netherlands had an Attachment Syllabus at their disposal.  This syllabus was used as a manual for the verification of requests to effect attachments.  As of the start of this year, the Attachment Syllabus can now also be consulted by solicitors, so that one can see in advance which requirements are made by the separate courts for the requests to effect an attachment.  Notwithstanding availability of the Attachment Syllabus, courts remain free to use their discretion in evaluating requests for attachment.  In other words, no rights can be derived from the contents of the Attachment Syllabus.

For further details, please read the full article at the EALG News/Information web page, or contact Jurgen van Berkel, De Boort Hermes De Bont, Tilburg, Holland, j.vanberkel@devoort.nl; http://www.devoort.nl.

back to top

NORWAY
NEW NORWEGIAN WORKING ENVIRONMENT AND WORKER PROTECTION ACT

Late in its 2005 spring session, the Norwegian Parliament passed a new Working Environment and Worker Protection Act.  The Act, which mainly maintains the basic principles of the 1977 Act, is intended to meet the need for flexibility in employment contracts and working hour periods.  The changes have met opposition from trade unions and the labour and socialist parties.    The amended legislation directly affects such areas as the right of temporary employment; pension rights when ownership of a business is transferred; the right of employees to stay in a position pending resolution of disputes over employment termination; working hours for managers and employees in independent positions; and the rights of whistle blowers.  The new law continues the basic principles for health, environment, and security set forth in the prior law, but with a stronger emphasis on the psycho-social working environment.  There is also a requirement that the employer or the employer's representatives are educated within the field of heath, environment, and security.  Parts of the new law became effective July 1, 2005, with the remainder coming into force on January 1, 2006.

For additional details, please read the full article at the EALG News/Information web page, or contact hcs@hartsang.no www.hartsang.no
 

back to top

UNITED STATES
OCEAN TRANSPORTATION INTERMEDIARIES GAIN NEW CONTRACT RIGHTS

The United States Federal Maritime Commission has issued a broad exemption to ocean transportation intermediaries giving them the right to enter into written contracts with their customers when providing international transportation services to and from the United States.  Under the existing statute, only ocean common carriers, i.e., vessel operators, can enter into written contracts with their customers.  Ocean transportation intermediaries, called non-vessel-operating common carriers (nvoccs) under U.S. law and freight forwarders in other countries, are required to provide their services pursuant to rates published in their tariffs.  However, exercising its authority to exempt such services from regulation, the Federal Maritime Commission has issued an exemption from tariff publishing for all nvoccs that enter into written contracts with their customers.  These contracts must meet certain regulatory requirements and be filed with the Federal Maritime Commission.

The right to enter into Nvocc Service Arrangements, or NSAs, has primarily been sought by large multimodal transportation companies, such as United Parcel Service and Federal Express. These companies have complained that current statutory requirements restrict their ability to negotiate and enter into flexible pricing and contractual arrangements in structuring supply chain systems for international manufacturers and distributors.  They claim that this places them at a competitive disadvantage with vessel operators.

While the new regulations have been in effect since early this year, to date use of these new contracts has been limited.  This is largely due to a pending legal challenge in a federal appellate court.  Opponents of the regulations claim that Congress explicitly refused to authorize the use of such contracts by nvoccs when it amended the relevant law in 1998.  The Federal Maritime Commission is currently considering proposals that may eliminate the legal objections to the new regulations, and thus remove some of the uncertainties about their use.  It has also opened a new proceeding to determine whether unaffiliated nvoccs/forwarders should be allowed to jointly offer NSAs.  Such contracts may become more widely used if the uncertainties surrounding their legality are removed.

For additional details, contact Ronald N. Cobert, Partner, or Andrew M. Danas, Partner, Grove, Jaskiewicz and Cobert, Washington, D.C.; rcobert@gjcobert.com; adanas@gjcobert.com;http://www.gjcobert.com.
 

back to top

UNITED STATES
COURTS SPLIT ON ANTITRUST IMMUNITY FOR INTERNATIONAL OCEAN FORWARDERS

Two federal appellate courts have issued conflicting decisions over whether ocean transportation intermediaries known as non-vessel-operating common carriers (nvoccs) or forwarders are entitled to an exemption under the antitrust laws if they engage in exempt activities under the United States Shipping Act.  The decisions involve the activities of companies providing transportation services for the United States Government in the Philippines and Europe.

In one decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, based in California, held that forwarders providing motor carrier services in the Philippines on U.S. military shipments are exempt from prosecution for price fixing under the United States antitrust laws because they operated pursuant to an exemption from the Shipping Act.  Under certain circumstances, that law confers an exemption from the antitrust laws on carriers providing ocean transportation services even if they engage in otherwise criminal offenses such as price fixing and market and customer allocations.

In a second decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, based in Richmond, Virginia, recently held that carriers providing similar services in transporting goods between the United States and Germany are not immune from the antitrust laws, even if their activities are exempt from regulation under the Shipping Act.  The Fourth Circuit held, in part, that the statutory exemption from the antitrust laws applies only if the forwarders have a "reasonable" basis to conclude that their activity is exempt from the antitrust laws.

The OECD recently recommended that its member countries repeal or modify the antitrust exemption for ocean shipping.  The European Union Competition Commission is currently engaged in a review of proposals to eliminate the antitrust block exemption for ocean shipping in EU countries.  The conflict between the two U.S. court decisions thus comes at a time where there is a heightened scrutiny of the need for an antitrust exemption in ocean shipping.  The conflict between the two U.S. court decisions is ultimately expected to be resolved by either the United States Supreme Court or through Congressional legislation.

For additional details, contact Ronald N. Cobert, Partner, or Andrew M. Danas, Partner, Grove, Jaskiewicz and Cobert, Washington, D.C.; rcobert@gjcobert.com; adanas@gjcobert.com; http://www.gjcobert.com.

back to top

ABOUT THE EALG

The Euro-American Lawyers Group (EALG) is an association of Law Firms founded in 1985.  The members of the EALG believe that they can best serve their clients' interests overseas by co-operating with like-minded firms who have local knowledge of, and immediate access to, the legal system operating in their own jurisdiction.

Eagle's philosophy is that local representation is vital in today's dynamic market where both legislation and commercial practice is changing regularly at both the national and international levels.

The EALG has steadily developed since its inception in 1985.  It now comprises twenty seven (27) law firms working in 20 different jurisdictions.  Each member has their own network of local contacts.

With member firms throughout Europe, the United States, and Asia, the EALG provides excellent communications to many of the important commercial centres of the world and access to hundreds of lawyers.  For further information about the EALG and its member law firms, please visit our web site at http://www.ealg.com.
 

back to top


 EALG BRIEFING is a free monthly e-mail publication of the Euro-American Lawyers Group (EALG) and is distributed by EALG member law firms.  The articles contained in EALG BRIEFING are a brief overview of recent legal developments in Europe and the United States.  The articles do not constitute legal opinions or advice and should not be regarded or relied upon as such.  By using this publication you agree to the Terms and Conditions of the EALG, which may be viewed on our web site at http://www.ealg.com.  If you have colleagues who may wish to subscribe to EALG BRIEFING, please feel free to pass along this e-mail to them.  To subscribe and be placed on our distribution list, they may send an e-mail to adanas@gjcobert.com or to the EALG contact in their jurisdiction.  To unsubscribe, please send an e-mail to the same address(es).

Copyright 2005.  Euro-American Lawyers Group.  All Rights Reserved.

 

 

Disclaimer

  Created by Internett Partner AS